The rumor mill ran wild following the extremely unbelievable Macbook pro refresh. Liquid metal, thorough Ssds, higher-res, updated design were among the false reports. What has changed however are the internals. Questions like: is this model worth upgrading to, or should I wait for the new model, will be answered in this article. Let's start with the changes.
Hardware
Best Laptops 2010
The model under the microscope is the high-end 15" model, which contains a 2.2ghz Sandy Bride quad core i7 processor, 4gb ram and a 6750m from Amd. That's a big upgrade from the previous generation. I've also opted for the high-res screen, which is a given in my (mac!)book. *pun intended*
Apart from the high-end 15" Macbook pro, Apple also offers two 13" models and a particular 17" machine. Over the board each model enjoys a faster processor, faster ram and thunderbolt.
The latter is very involving and a first for any laptop on the market! I'm unmistakably not going into too much information about it but basically it's Intel's sass to Usb. The association is capable of transferring video, audio and data, all simultaneously at very high speeds. That means that a Dvd movie will replacement to external storage in about 6 seconds once supported hardware comes out.
When deciding in the middle of models perceive that the 13" models all share an Intel Hd 3000 graphics as sole provider. This is a source of dissatisfaction for gamers out there because the chip is pretty weak for modern games. The smaller models also use the gaps in the middle of the keys as speaker holes and lack a subwoofer; expect a slightly more tin sound.
The 17" model has a 1920×1200 display and similar specs to the 15" Macbook pro. This is both a good and bad thing. The good thing is that you'll have slightly more screen real estate but gaming on native resolution will assuredly struggle.
Body
As noted Apple has retained its preponderant unibody design for this generation of Macbooks. I don't consider this a bad thing. Built from a particular piece of aluminum, this laptop is very scratch resistant and clean looking. My previous Macbook Pro (same design) assuredly withstood the test of time. (not a particular scratch!)
In my view this is the best looking laptop apart from the Macbook Air. Its design is very symmetrical. All things is exactly where you'd expect it to be. Like how the speaker holes match the vertical space used by the keyboard keys. The width of the hinge also perfectly matches the horizontal keyboard space. Using a aggregate of black and silver, Apple managed to originate something very aesthetically pleasing. however I'd have loved to see some Macbook Air elements take over. The battery indicator for one seems unnecessary to me and the Dvd super drive is bound to disappear. Guess we can expect those changes in a redesign later on.
Still the Macbook Pro 2011 is among the sturdiest and best looking laptops out there, a real winner!
Display
The 15" model comes thorough with a resolution of 1440×900. This can be upgraded to 1680×1050, something every person should do. Apple uses a high-end Tn display, so still no Ips unfortunately.
The viewing angles are decent. It's inherent to read text and distinguish details at any angle. However, inevitably, the screen washes out from the sides, especially grays come to be yellowish; consideration the app store panel lines. I also noticed that the screen has a weak-spot for lower and upper angles. Even at a small degree colors started to fade. This is why we want Ips panels, they're just noticeably better at this. Still the Macbook Pro has one of the better screens out there. Colors unmistakably pop and the pixel density feels just right. People looking for ultra-realistic color reproductions will have to look at production screens, what else is new?
For the first time ever Apple managed to jam a Hd facetime camera into the slick display. This is a logical step in the evolution of video calling in the middle of Apple devices. To test this I called my laptop using the iPhone 4 and configured the facetime app.
Calling is easy and direct. Plainly click a phone number or e-mail in your contacts and the system will exertion to set up a facetime call. This process can sometimes take a dinky longer depending on the network, but after the preliminary process it's usually a smooth ride. The image is crisp and pleasing; but without being overwhelming. The image is still soft, and comparable to Logitech solutions at best. Still for such a small camera that's a solid achievement.
Benchmarks
Now it's time to put the internals to the test. This is Apple's fastest notebook contribution so my expectations were sky high. First thing I wanted to have a look at is the battery. Apple advertises 7 hours of battery for every Macbook Pro model it offers. That's down from 8-10 hours for the previous generation. Most of this is probably due to the faster processor and a new way of testing that supposedly better represents real world results.
I fully expensed the laptop and left the settings at default. The brightness sensor was turned on for more realistic results. During the test I used everyday apps like Microsoft words and Safari. To mix things up some light 3D work was thrown into the mix.
6 hours battery recorded
Very decent results. It's still not at the point of an whole workday but does very well especially considering it has a thirsty quad-core working at all time. Macbook Air is king in the battery department.
Geekbench
This favorite mac-benchmarking tool is often used as thorough to calculate hardware speed. Unfortunately the free version only runs in 32bit, so the extreme speed should be a bit faster even. Mind you: the other macs also ran in 32bit mode.
2010 model: 5395
2011 model: 9981
So for the People still in doubt either this speed bump is considerable; here's your answer. It's approximately twice as fast!
Xbench
This free benchmarking tool is a great way to get a clear photograph of the machine. Not only does it give a score, it also compares the drive and weaknesses of each mac. To prevent incidental scores, this test was run three times and averaged out the following score.
2010 model: 228 - 218 - 486
2011 model: 387 - 248 - 758
The Macbook Pro outperformed its predecessor easily. The cpu score increase may not look like much, but the i7 was already a screamer and to make a 30 point jump over that is a lot. Also considering that the dual core → i7 gap is equally large.
Application test
The time it takes to get underway an app is indispensable for a permissible user experience. The Air does unmistakably well at this so I used it as the benchmark. The Macbook Pro comes with a new generation of 750gb 5400rpm drives. The extra data density and newest Seagate technologies should give it the edge over previous Pro-models. But how close can it get to its Ssd rapid thinner sister?
Both machines woke from a cold boot when they put down these scores. It looks like the Macbook Air is 2-3x faster. Now some smaller applications:
Macbook Air:
iTunes: 2 sec
iPhoto '11: 4 sec
Words '11: 4 sec (8 sec incl template)
Macbook pro:
iTunes: 4 sec
iPhoto '11: 9 sec
Words '11: 7 sec (17 sec incl template)
Quite a unlikeness and it's noticeable. Having used both machines sometimes the Pro feels slower. I should note that once applications have been opened, speeds do enhance a lot. Occasion up Photoshop for a second time only takes 4 seconds. But from a cold boot the Air conquers all. Luckily users are free to upgrade the Ram and storage later on as Ssd prices continue to drop. I can't wait!
700mb video conversion
Now this one is a biggie. Let's see how Intel's Sandy Bridge fairs in a pure processor intensive task; converting a movie to the iPhone format. To test this I installed a video converter from iSkysoft and loaded up a 700mb.avi movie. Settings were left at default and the target file was set to "iPhone 4, mp4", with 640×480 pixels.
Macbook Air: 50 minutes (time to complete)
Macbook Pro: 10 minutes
Now mind you the Macbook Air has a 1.86ghz dual core processor compared to the Sandy Bridge quad core i7 2.2ghz from the Pro model. That's two generations behind and lacking two extra cores; it shows. This is the drive of the current Macbook Pro generation; it unmistakably is a transported workhorse. It should also be shared that the Macbook Pro's processor kept a 20 ~ 25% margin at all time, whereas the Air kept pushing its limits.
Gaming
This particular model comes adequate with a Radeon 6750m 1gb Gpu. That's up from the Nvidia 330m 512mb present in previous Macbooks. Now it's time to see how much unlikeness a year makes. Games were either tested in Mac natively or under Bootcamp (windows 7, 64bit).
Crysis
Released in 2007, Crytek had set the bar for hardware for many years now. And still new products struggle to run the game at whatever beyond 1920×1080 res. I first attempted a run at 1024x 768 pixels, comparing it to last year's outing.
Macbook Pro 2010: 41fps (medium)
Macbook pro 2011: 57fps (medium)
That's pretty good and I unmistakably got a dinky daring. So I upped the resolution to 1670×1050 (native, Bto), and ran the same tests.
Macbook Pro 2011 (native resolution, high): 23
Using the native resolution some gamers may want to divert to medium settings. Still for a laptop these are unmistakably decent scores!
Company of heroes
Games like Coh have turned out to be real classics. Playing skirmish is still a blast and because the game is from 2007, high settings should be on the cards. I turned every dial to maximum and held my breath.
Minimum: 1.8fps
Average: 65fps
Maximum: 132
For no apparent reason, company of Heroes can be run at full and the game still looks terrific. The minimum was 1.8fps, but upon additional investigation this only happened once for a split second. So seemingly the system was doing something in the background which caused some momentarily instability.
F1 2010
Codemasters' newest racer. I used the newest 1.01 patch (Dx11) and the internal benchmarking tool, which includes a full grid lap colse to the Silverstone circuit. Remember that Dx11 settings are only used in the ultra range.
1680x1050 2xAa
high: 42fps average
ultra: 20fps average
The game performance is unmistakably good for a midsized laptop. It should be said though that the fan speed went pretty wild During some of the peak moments. In fact sometimes they sometimes hit 2500+rpm for seemingly no reason. Here are the temp and decibels produced, agreeing to internal readings and an iPhone decibel app.
Temps, fans, noise
To get a good reading I played Civilization 5 (mac native, though lazy port) for a few hours and kept steady track of the db throughout. The ambient was dead silent apart from some occasional cars/talks etc. I cut those out and calculated the average.
38db - 46.3db. With an average of 42.6db. This may or may not ring any bells, but in human language; the fans were audible but stayed in check. They would be too loud for a dramatic scene in a movie, but gameplay wise it's fine.
The fans didn't start kicking in until about 20 minutes into the game, after which they remained steady at about 2700rpm each. Temps clocked at the following:
Intel Cpu: 67 degrees Celsius (idle: 46) | or 153 Fahrenheit (idle: 115)
Amd Gpu: 65 degrees Celsius (idle: 45) | or 149 Fahrenheit (idle: 113)
This again may or may not tell a lot but in any case the Macbook wasn't complaining and the case felt warm at best. Note though that it's early spring now and things could be separate mid-June. But from sense I think everything's just fine.
Conclusions
The Macbook Pro 2011 is a great upgrade over the previous models. Most changes are internal and it shows. The speed increase is pretty dramatic, production this the first real transported "Mac pro". It comes at a price though. The spectacular, unibody design sometimes struggles to keep the hardware at bay. It should also be noted that they're still very expensive and that users with shallow pockets could be forced into using Intel graphics. Not a great thing for a 00+ laptop. This particular model however is as good as it gets; despite, in Apple world, now looking like the run of the mill.
Now to sass your questions. For me 2010 Macbook pro owners shouldn't feel rushed to upgrade, in fact 13-inch gamers shouldn't at all. And yeah you could wait for a redesign, it's always possible. But deciding to wait at the beginning of a goods cycle seems like a silly thing to me. It's like saying: yeah I'll wait for the next model 'cuz it will have All things I could wish for. The thing is; that may or may not be the case but consider this: the model after that will be even better. So buy it now (just launched) if you want/need it.
score 4.5/5
Macbook Pro review
See Also : printer ink toner http://dymmprinter.blogspot.com/ http://bespcspeakers.blogspot.com/
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น